Conversation
leviport
approved these changes
Jun 10, 2024
ahoneybun
approved these changes
Jun 11, 2024
erinxocon
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 23, 2026
erinxocon
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 23, 2026
erinxocon
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 23, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Jenn had trouble finding the lemp13 tech docs today because she didn't know how to get to tech docs without clicking one of the links for a specific model. To help remedy that, I think it would be a good idea to include a general link to tech docs and a mention that newer models may not be listed in the table yet, since they always have to show up there before they can be added here.
(Long-term, it would be nice to figure out a better solution for tech docs discoverability, like the one initially proposed in #1145 but in a more fitting spot. And this Markdown table is getting pretty cumbersome to update, so it might be good to figure out a better format for the article here, too.)